Someone operating a business without a business property or a registered business, most likely avoiding paying the tax as well because I know most of them are looking a direct bank transfer. They should really have a licensing department to bring them down, rather than OOC restrictions. This should really be a IC matter with government, it would be a licensing issue. I’m pretty sure there is something else if you’re not qualified within the trade. It falls under a clean neighbourhood and environment. Although there is laws you may abide by some, if you’re activity selling vehicles in a estate or a place with little parking room. Literally where I’m from there are a lot of main dealerships, private dealerships & a lot of people who basically buy vehicles, fix them up and sell them on or either sell from their house where they’d have five vehicles or more. There is a lot of cellphone vehicle sales in real life, they’re called trades men. TL DR: Communicate all rule changes with a general announcement and proofread the wording of the amendment and the announcement. If a non-affiliated criminal might be liable to stricter consequences (if admin permission is given) as mentioned by the rule, then shouldn’t that be the outset for the serious illegal roleplayers? I’m not going to comment on the report, but it did lead me to see something where a severe lack of communication is showing: The rule was amended, seemingly by one side (IFM), and the community wasn’t notified, other than in the linked topic, where players not involved with IFM, usually won’t look because there is no reason for them to visit that part of the forums.Īnd so we get to the suggestion: Don’t amend rules without a general announcement about it.Īdditionally: The wording in the post on the IFM noticeboard is less than ideal and (to me) implies organized crime factions aren’t held to a high(er) standard, which can’t be what’s meant, surely.
The reported party responds with (paraphrasing): “it’s allowed, cause we’re an illegal faction”. Until you realize today, reading a report (outcome pending) of someone’s character being abducted and transported to a ‘quiet’ area (subjective, as said: outcome pending). That seemed to be it, rule implemented, no further announcement made. Likely in an attempt to respond to a very popular topic on the matter. So, as we all know from this announcement, a rule was added.